Home » Chrome Banishes JPEG XL Photo Format That Could Save Phone Space

Chrome Banishes JPEG XL Photo Format That Could Save Phone Space

by admin

what’s happening

Google’s Chrome team has announced that it will be removing support for JPEG XL, a photo format that offers space saving and image quality benefits.

why it matters

Google likes AVIF, the rival format they helped develop. However, JPEG XL has some advantages that photographers will appreciate.

of New JPEG XL standard It requires dramatically less storage space than JPEG while providing the highest image quality. This is the factor that helped convince Adobe’s photography experts to adopt this technology.But Google’s Chrome team Photo format rejected Agree with rival technology.

In an age where we have to decide whether to pay an extra $100 for a phone with more storage space, technology that reduces the size of photo files seems like a great idea. However, getting to that future is tedious.

JPEGXL is Industry standardbut Google likes rivals who helped develop Abihuthe Apple iPhone takes pictures in yet another format. HEIC.

I have more to like JPEGXL than saving space.this is Adjusted for photography, better at preserving fine details and textures than video-derived formats such as AVIF and HEIC. JPEG XL also improves image quality with HDR support. This is one of the reasons Adobe (who is usually conservative in supporting new file formats) endorsed it. Facebook appreciates the speed of JPEG XL, and Intel considers his JPEG XL to be the best next-generation photo format option.

Google has no veto power over the future of JPEG XL, but as the makers of the world’s most used browser, it can effectively block its use on the web.

Fighting over industry standards is a common problem that hinders new technology and confuses consumers in the short term. VHS and Betamax, classic examples, fragmented his VCR video recording industry in the 1980s, leaving millions of customers to lose out. Smartphone charging is split between USB-C and Lightning, Apple is moving away from the Lightning portWireless charging didn’t take off until the Qi standard beat out incompatible rivals.

As the industry solves its problems, the decades-old JPEG will be able to maintain its place at the center of the photography world for a little longer. So you might be better off paying for extra storage on your phone, Google Photos, or Apple iCloud.

Google’s Strong Position: No JPEG XL

Don’t expect Google to change its stance.

“During our experiments to support JPEG-XL in Chrome, we came to the conclusion that there is no real advantage over AVIF, and unlike AVIF, JPEG-XL has not been adopted by other browsers.” the company said in a statement Wednesday. “At this time he has no plans to support JPEG-XL. Instead, we will continue to focus on improving Chrome’s existing formats.”

Chrome now supports JPEG XL. This is often abbreviated as JXL for the filename extension, but requires a somewhat technical process to specifically enable it. Friday’s software update Google removed JPEG XL support For the Chrome version debuting in the next few weeks.Sunday JPEG XL Deletion Explained Google says it has decided to discontinue the format due to low adoption, insufficient benefits, and efforts to improve the “existing format”.

As a result, feature tracking systems were inundated with comments in favor of JPEG XL. JPEG XL Advocate Jon Sneyers, contributed to the creation of the standard. “I think it’s clear that JPEG XL really brings something that existing formats don’t,” he said in a comment.he also published details Blog post promoting the benefits of JPEG XL on tuesday.

JPEG XL fans: Adobe, Facebook, Intel, and even Google

Sniers works at cloudyInternet infrastructure companies, and JPEG XL Backerand has some important allies.

“We believe JPEG XL is the best codec currently available for the widespread distribution and consumption of HDR still photography.” Eric Chan, senior engineer at Adobe, said: In the August comments before Google made the decision to drop JPEG XL. “I’ve done some comparisons with AVIF, but I prefer JPEG XL for its versatility and faster encoding speed.”

This speed is especially important for Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop customers who frequently export hundreds or thousands of photos, he said. Adobe has built JPEG XL support into Photoshop, but you have to enable it manually.

Speed ​​is also a major reason Facebook prefers JPEG XL, says a Facebook image team member Eric Andre said in 2021.

Intel sees JPEG XL as a key enabler for HDR, employing technology that spans a wider range of bright and dark tones. “Browser support is a critical missing link for this ecosystem,” said Intel principal his engineer Roland Wooster. VESA Mozilla’s Display Standards Group in an August post about whether Firefox should support JPEG XL.

e-commerce company Shopify likes JPEG XL It has the advantage of showing good color and detail, which is important for product photography.

Even Google has fans. Researcher Jyrki Alakuijala, who has helped design several compression technologies, said in 2020: JPEG XL is technically the strongest It is the most feature-rich option among the new image formats.

In a statement Wednesday, Adobe said it was considering AVIF. recently shipped Camera Raw 15.0 with High Dynamic Range support as a Technology Preview. This includes support for reading and writing JPEG XL photos,” said Adobe.

Mozilla and Facebook parent company Meta declined to comment. Intel declined to comment.

Is AVIF the future of our photography?

JPEG XL isn’t the only way to improve image quality on the web. Google is a major proponent of AVIF. AVIF is Alliance for Open Media’s AV1 video formatLike JPEG XL, AVIF is royalty-free, supports HDR, and is accelerated from modern processors with multiple processor cores.

Mozilla helped develop Google’s AVIF, which is built into Chrome and Firefox. Apple started supporting AVIF In Safari on MacOS 13 and iOS 16. HEIC is hampered by patent licensing requirements and is unlikely to be a successful format on the web.

AVIF has some drawbacks, including a reputation for being slow to create compared to JPEG XL. This can slow down photo slideshows on the web and interfere with burst mode photos on mobile phones. Also, AVIF doesn’t have a “progressive” option to quickly bring low-quality images onto your website and flesh out their details. This allows the website to load without elements jumping around.

AVIF can beat JPEG XL if there are big names supporting it.

But don’t expect to find out right away. Next time you upgrade, consider skipping the 256GB smartphone and buying 512GB of storage.

You may also like

Leave a Comment