Home » 2 ways the new MacBook Pros are worse than predecessors

2 ways the new MacBook Pros are worse than predecessors

by admin

of Introducing the new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Prosand in almost all respects they are 2021 modelBetter graphics, longer battery life and faster connections. The exterior looks the same, but the internal upgrades are real.

But there are two aspects of these machines that may be inferior to the original 2021 model, and they are not important.

SSD issues

Macs are generally known for using super-fast storage, even on machines with cheap configurations. However, with the M2 launch last year, the company cut corners to make the base-level laptop a little cheaper.

To 256GB model uses only a single NAND chip The MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro have significantly slower storage speeds than their larger models.In fact, in real tests like large file transfers, these are M2 MacBook was slower than M1 MacBookThe lack of transparency was frustrating, but considering the price of these laptops, it wasn’t a big deal.

The motherboard of the M2 MacBook Air is published on YouTube Teardown.

I was convinced that using the M2 Pro and M2 Max MacBook Pros would avoid this problem entirely.But According to some new reports, the 512GB configuration of these new MacBook Pros also has slow storage speeds, and some believe Apple has carved the same corner this time around. Remember: Apple doesn’t sell his 256GB versions of these MacBook Pros, so they’re the cheapest models you can buy.

The problem is that even if you opt for one of the base configurations, buyers of these MacBook Pros are much more likely to notice a speed difference, or at least be frustrated that Apple doesn’t come closer. is high.

Luckily, this is a problem that seems to be avoided by choosing one of the larger SSDs. However, the second problem is much more difficult to avoid.

heat and heat

The new MacBook Pro seen from the side.

From the beginning, efficiency has been a key selling point for Apple Silicon. It’s a miracle how quiet and cool the M1 Mac ran despite its excellent performance and battery life. These are all advantages of using a more efficient chip that produces less hot air.

However, the M2 didn’t work quite the same.in the Fanless MacBook Air, the M2 certainly delivered some extra performance, but at the expense of some extra heat. I see. It’s too hot for the laptop to reach safely. Other laptop manufacturers limit CPU temperatures to 100 degrees Celsius, but devices rarely come close to that threshold. The fact that Apple hasn’t put a similar cap on his M2 chip is a bit worrying, which is what’s causing the increased throttling for long, demanding workloads. Scenario similar to M2 on 13″ MacBook Prodespite active cooling.

But again, these weren’t necessarily laptops Made for these types of more demanding tasks.Therefore most people M2 MacBook Air That scenario is rare. But his 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros are different. These machines are dedicated to users who need the extra performance needed for their creative applications.

I haven’t tested it myself yet, but I suspect these new 14-inch and 16-inch MacBook Pros will run a little hot this time around, for the same reasons as the M2 MacBook Air.I hope to corroborate this with my own temperature readings soon, but the reason for this expectation is all technology related. behind New M2 Pro and M2 Max chips.

An Apple representative in front of a MacBook Pro presentation.

The new chip is based on the same chip architecture as the base M2. As Apple calls it “2nd generation 5nm”, this sounds fine. At least on paper.But given these can It’s more of a stopgap measure than a true evolution.

The manufacturing issues with TMSC’s 3nm chips are well documented and at one point it seems that they were what the M2 Pro and M2 Max were supposed to be based on. The 3nm chips were more efficient, allowing Apple to get the performance boost it needed without the extra heat. There are even rumors that the new MacBook Pro will jump to TSMC’s 4nmlike the A16 chip in iPhone 14 Pro and 14 Pro Max. Instead, what Apple has finally released here is based on the same 5nm process node as the original M1 Pro and M1 Max.

Again, from an efficiency standpoint, we know how these perform on the base M2 chip. It’s not that they’re inefficient — they’re not.But they are overclocked chips that have been pushed harder than the M1 chips and will make some changes to the performance and heat of these machines. YouTuber Max Tech points outApple says the performance gains are within the same power envelope, but doesn’t admit that previous MacBook Pros often failed to operate at these higher power levels.

Yes, the claims of 20% better CPU performance and 30% better graphics than the previous model are probably true. Apple added more cores to the CPU and GPU, boosted the base clock speeds — and boom, there’s a performance boost. However, more testing is needed to see how it handles throttling for tasks such as rendering particularly long videos.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to love about these new MacBook Pros. And if you have an old, old MacBook or Windows laptop, there’s little to complain about. But for me, details about the M2 and SSD choices lessened my excitement about the release of his MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro last year.

Editor’s pick






You may also like

Leave a Comment